When looking for accurate Forex signals all factors such as entry point, stop loss and take profits should be clearly visible…Read more
4 129 Bitcoins have three qualities useful in a currency, according to The Economist in January 2015: they are "hard to earn…Read more
Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. Again, Jimmy Song is independent of the people that run the currency in question, so I'm a little confused why you would claim this isn't an independent source. Both links were to CoinStalker. As to the requirement that the reliability of the text must bitcoin verkaufen steuern be provable - consult WP:IRS#Definition of a source. Segwit2x Fails For a number of reasons, BTC1 was adopted by almost no one.
" Jimmy Song has had work published by third-party publications. And you can get this by using the same keys as in the BTC Chain, sounds familiar? While no metric is individually sufficient to analyze the uptake and success of a fork, taken together, a pattern of evidence can be built. Wikipedia is not a collection of links. If you think some of the sources aren't good, give concrete reasons why with citation of actual lines of policy. I think this article the purpose was supposed to be in fact a directory. One promising measure is the number of addresses with a nonzero balance. Moreover, the page you cite does not even contain any text related to "the block height the currency was forked at".
So in this case, it doesn't matter if we know who published it or not. The upgrade did not cause a blockchain fork. Market cap also faces issues with supply: given that many forks have comparatively little uptake (activated coins) relative to a parent chain, it seems odd for them to inherit the parent supply. By layering on alternative on-chain datasets, richer conclusions can be drawn. Retimuko ( talk ) 19:47, (UTC) I gave two sources, which both support each other in their content, which gives credence to both. List-Class on the project's quality scale. You have made wikipedia less useful. BillyMiles ( talk ) 01:58, (UTC) In context of Wikipedia I don't believe neither CoinMarketCap, nor the exchanges. Retimuko ( talk ) 00:04, (UTC) Why the unsourced content is getting restored with a comment that no reason was given for removal?
It is possible to use primary source as reliable source for information about each specific fork, primary sources cannot signify notability but they can be used as reliable source. I see no evidence that they are. Paired with the active supply analysis, this suggests bitcoin forks that while BCH has a good fraction of active supply, it is held in a more concentrated userbase. So active supply must be heavily caveated it is probably not very informative for chains with highly concentrated ownership. I clicked it and found exactly what I was looking for: a complete list of all the forks that have occurred, with the dates they happened. Applying the uptake discount would grant BSV a market cap of 343m rather than its claimed 1,308m, a 74 percent difference. Moved 'Clam' from 'Not Forks also poorly named) to the same section as it also utilized a copy of the utxo. I did not expect to get into a debate like this about what constitutes a reliable source.
I propose to clean up the list and only keep entries with Wikipedia pages or reputable secondary sources. In short: "Being articles, stand-alone lists are subject to Wikipedia's content policies, such as verifiability, no original research, neutral point of view, and what Wikipedia is not, as well as the notability guidelines." Anyone can create a fork and a web site about. CoinMarketCap seems to be just an aggregator of information from exchanges. Ladislav Mecir ( talk ) 21:08, 2 December 2018 (UTC) I didn't make two reverts. Therefore, I do agree with its deletion. Infographic Key, bitcoin Core, bitcoin launched in 2009 when Satoshi Nakamoto released the first Bitcoin codebase. Active supply was designed to be more resistant to spoofing than transaction value, since the most an adversary can do is to make their coins look permanently active. Currently the page have more info about bitcoin fork than list of fork, and. The fraction of supply which is active is bottoming on all the timeframes.
The notion of uptake in particular challenges market cap, suggesting that large fractions of the troubled metric are entirely illusory. So why did you remove all the content I added? Mid, this article has been rated. Indeed, Bitcoin Knots is designed to remain compatible with Bitcoin Core it just offers different features. Fresheneesz ( talk ) 23:42, 23 November 2018 (UTC) "Self-published writings of any kind can be used as one of the sources verifying information about that person or entity doing the self-publishing." - well, there are two problems. Or faq web published some claim, but not that the published claim is a fact. Also on Bitcore's website they say "Not a fork!". (Both the new cryptocurrency and its main implementation share the name Bitcoin SV now.) Bitcoin Dark Bitcoin Dark was a codebase fork of Bitcoin Core, making for a cryptocurrency with the same name: Bitcoin Dark. My hypothesis is this: The article overall List of bitcoin forks notability is not in dispute There are more and less notable forks of bitcoin We are discussing here which forks to include and what sourcing rules to apply given above. @ Ladislav Mecir : do you have a comment? This whole argument above is pretty absurd in my opinion because no one even tried to add good sources.
Similarly, in our case, we can easily use the page to confirm that the tcoindiamond. Fresheneesz ( talk ) 07:04, 26 November 2018 (UTC) Ok well given that no one (including you) has brought up even a single line of policy that any of these sources violate, I'm going to add one or two to the page. Org seems to be banned on Wikipedia. What you propose is so far from the basic rules of Wikipedia that I don't see how you don't see. Bitcoin SV Bitcoin Satoshis Vision (Bitcoin SV) is a codebase fork of Bitcoin ABC, but tweaked to ensure that it would become incompatible with the Bitcoin Cash protocol at a certain point in time.
A total lack of fees demonstrates poor preparedness for a rapidly-approaching fee market regime, and evidences weak demand to use the chain. What are the "accurate circulating supply figures"? Org - primary source m, m, m, m, m - crypto rags m - blog not a single independent reliable source. @ Jtbobwaysf : I believe exchanges are not considered primary sources when there are no relationship between the exchange and people who imitated forks. We cover this issue in detail towards the end of this piece. I know there are too many sources. C933103 ( talk ) 22:50, 25 November 2018 (UTC) For sure we don't do this external links for reasons of anti-seo policy. This is the most fundamental principle of Wikipedia. List This article has been rated as List-Class on the project's quality scale. Take batching in Bitcoin, it is common for heavy users of the network to aggregate many payments to different recipients in a single transaction, for efficiencys sake. This is consistent with the theory that Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin Gold were redistributive indifferent sellers recognized their coins and sold them off for more BTC, with a few large committed buyers scooping up this liquidity.
4 is being used solely to source the block height the currency was forked at, and so is a perfectly valid source for this according to wikipedia policy." - According to the policy you cite, the source 4 would. So using his blog is perfectly acceptable on wikipedia. Ladislav Mecir ( talk ) 16:11, 21 November 2018 (UTC) Ok I'm going to take this one step at a time. Bitcoin Knots, bitcoin Knots is an example of a codebase fork of Bitcoin Core. They have thousands of tokens listed btw Jtbobwaysf ( talk ) 06:44, (UTC) C933103 "While in some cases exchanges could have relations with particular forks, the problem can be purged by excluding these sources on a fork-by-fork basis" Exchanges have. 6 is a news source that claims to adhere to the "highest quality standards". Wikipedia is not a collection of random links. Namely, in this edit : bitcoindiamond. Aggregate fees, one measure which is often overlooked is quite simply the aggregate value of fees paid to transact on a given chain. Substantiate your claim for once. This is a self-published blog.
I don't care about the self-published source. Several other users above have said the same thing. Otherwise we will have to get rid of almost the whole thing. These can contain thousands of total payments. C933103 ( talk ) 06:22, (UTC)- Relisting. The current "list" seems more like an introduction to bitcoin forks, which is why I think it would be more apporipate to move the article to a name that bitcoin forks does not say "list of". Info for the coinmarketcap site that I cited come from the site's FAQ which is linked on the bottom of each page in the respective site. The word fork is somewhat confusing because there are different kinds of forks that mean very different things. I couldn't find good sources for these: Bitcoin Hot : Forked at Block, 12 December 2017, For each 1 BTC you get 100 BTH BitcoinX : Forked at Block, 12 December 2017, For each 1 BTC you. Also, While in some cases exchanges could have relations with particular forks, the problem can be purged by excluding these sources on a fork-by-fork basis, and also by including only notable or large exchanges as a measure for forks' notability.
C933103 ( talk ) 06:12, (UTC) I agree. You claim that many of the sources I listed were "rejected" by some discussion, but didn't respond to my question about where I could bitcoin forks read that discussion. Luckily, it has happened only two or three times in Bitcoins history, and each time it was resolved through community coordination without much damage. "I'm glad we agree that this source can be used for this case, despite being self-published." - I made the effort to explain to you why it actually cannot be used. Bitcoin Core (Not the Implementation) In early 2018, most of the Bitcoin Clashic community adopted a codebase fork of the Bitcoin Clashic client, called Bitcoin Core. Retimuko ( talk ) 02:47, 3 December 2018 (UTC) Others have failed to support the idea that these aren't independent reliable sources. Fresheneesz ( talk ) 06:47, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Well,. Relative economic vibrancy can also be ascertained with the NVT metric. Jtbobwaysf ( talk ) 15:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC) Oppose Its a list. How do we know the information is accurate? So please respond on the talk page.
Where Bitcoin Cash was born out of a long-standing disagreement within the Bitcoin community, other forkcoins generally considered a blockchain fork to simply be a good way of launching a new coin. Retimuko ( talk ) 21:05, (UTC) How about you try to find sources for things before deleting content? In the last month, however, BCH and BSV account for 3 and 2 percent of Bitcoins transaction count, respectively. Forked at Block 501451, 28 December 2017, For each 1 BTC you get 1 B2X Bitcoin Uranium : Forked on 31st December 2017, For each 1 BTC you get 1 BUM Bitcoin Pizza : Forked at Block. The task here is to find a measure that captures organic, non-contrived commercial or transactional activity and evidence of adoption on a given fork. Primefac ( talk ) 19:42, 27 November 2018 (UTC) I agree with that.
If the users of a fork dont have similar habits (because fees are lower, for instance, and efficiencies are not sought transaction count will appear higher on the non-batched chain. What are you trying to pull? Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Ladislav Mecir ( talk ) 06:37, 26 November 2018 (UTC) 4 is absolutely a claim about the source's author - which is the developers of bitcoin diamond. Retimuko ( talk ) 03:59, 30 December 2017 (UTC) New user here, what specifically is a 'reliable secondary source' in the crypto space? We currently track active supply for the trailing month, six months, and year, although it can be done for any period. Is this something you consider not notable or sourced well enough? Exchanges performing wallet management are a big culprit: the typical process for deposits involve users depositing funds to a unique address, which is then swept into a hot wallet. Praxidicae bitcoin forks ( talk ) 18:55, 19 November 2018 (UTC) If you removed the content because you think the sources aren't sufficient, you should have said as much in your edit summary, rather than simply mentioning removing redlinks (that you created). The whole list must go! and "Are you a Bitcoin fork? If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. The continued contraction is potential evidence of stagnation and an inability to onboard new users.
Since transaction value and NVT are both considered glamor metrics that is, they make a bitcoin forks blockchain look attractive they are obvious targets for manipulation. I thought i'd rename the section to "Not Bitcoin forks". List-Class on the quality scale. What do others think about this? However, when some of these forks were new, blocks were stuffed full, perhaps as a proof of concept for larger blocks. Can you elaborate on what a "crypto rag" is and why those sites fall under that category? I am of the general opinion that a listing of the various bitcoin forks is the purpose of this article and would be encyclopedic. Attracting meaningful demand to transact is a prerequisite for the development of serious fees which could generate sufficient security, post reward. Were limiting this analysis to utxo forks of Bitcoin since metrics generalize easily that is, they are eminently comparable and they have the nice quality of maintaining ceteris paribus. Retimuko ( talk ) 19:40, (UTC) @ Retimuko Some of these forked coins are now live, claimable, actively being traded on various exchanges, and listed. I just moved them back into the other section now, so the first line of text about utxo forks will need to be amended slightly at least, because it now may read like the ones mentioned above. Other traits impair comparability.
It is a nice visual demonstration of how forks inherit the utxo sets of their parent chains and build on them or concentrate them. Jtbobwaysf ( talk ) 18:36, 26 November 2018 (UTC) You're right, there's nothing wrong with including non-linked articles in lists. Holders of BTC received 10 BCD/BTC. It does not provide an overview of all forks that have happened. Ben Best : Talk 19:52, (UTC) I see it was reverted. Sorry, this is against the policy. Simply pasting links to wikipedia policy and essays is not justification for removal of content. Either way, it did not cause a blockchain fork. This is a technical relevant information regarding the page"List of Bitcoin forks" MSAlter ( talk ) 16:55, (UTC) Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the edit protected template. In doing so, it created a new cryptocurrency, called Bitcoin Cash. Fresheneesz ( talk ) 23:17, 8 December 2018 (UTC) @ Fresheneesz : No, they did not fail. This happens regularly, even today. A fork must be notable and the information must be based on independent reliable sources.
A codebase fork typically makes tweaks to the original codebase. However, bitcoin forks a small minority of users chose to continue using the first Bitcoin Cash protocol (mostly as a joke) and adopted a new name for this cryptocurrency: Bitcoin Clashic. List, this article has been rated. Ladislav Mecir ( talk ) 08:15, 23 November 2018 (UTC) " the article is not about the tcoindiamond. The reasons were stated here and in the edit comments. Please replace my edit and simply remove the external links (rather than replacing them with redlinks). Soft fork upgrades can cause blockchain forks, but enforcement by a majority of hash power guarantees eventual convergence on the same transaction history. Fresheneesz ( talk ) 07:49, 21 November 2018 (UTC) What about this edit: Bitcoin Diamond: Forked at Block, 24 November 2017. Creativecuriosity 04:03, (UTC) We should consider sources according to WP:RS, which also discusses bias (reliable doesn't mean unbiased).